Please enter your postcode
Close
Thanks
Your enquiry has been sent to local dealers
Need something else for your car?
Get quotes from mechanics
Logbook service, brake repairs and more
Need wiper blades? 
Buy premium wiper blades for your car
Compare vehicle loans
Compare loans from 70+ lenders
Thank you ,
Your review has been submitted successfully.
Good luck !
Good luck !
Continue
Thank you for your tyre review.
For your chance to win a $500 towards your next purchase with Auto Hero, simply review your recent experience with us. Click the buttons below to leave your review!
I truly value your opinion. It's vital to make sure we can continue to improve our service in the future.
Regards, Matt Customer success www.autohero.com.au
Searching...
We'll find the best deal on tyres so you don't have to.
Momo Tires M-3 OUTRUN 205 55 R17 91 V Tyres
TYRE DETAILS
Momo Tires
M-3 OUTRUN
| Size: | 205/55R17 91V |
| Runflat: | No |
Description
MOMO tyres best choice for high performance vehicles and for the most demanding drivers, the Outrun M3 is MOMO tyres’ most premium offering. It delivers maximum safety and a high precision sports driving experience, while ensuring a high level of comfort thanks to the low rolling noise.
Warranty
All tyres are backed by manufacturer's warranty against defects in design and faulty workmanship.
Reviews
Overall Rating (based on 6 reviews)
4.5 stars
5 stars
5
4 stars
0
3 stars
1
2 stars
0
1 stars
0
Noise
4
Wet Braking
4
Dry Braking
4
Cornering
4
Wear
4
Nimesh 05 Jul 2016
Awesome tires for price. Good traction and tread wear so far.
Had these tires on my 01 WRX for nearly 10 months and have done over 10,000km s. Only 280 tread wear but they are very grippy both on wet and dry and quiet. I m yet to find out how long they ll last. Don t be put off by the cheap price and where i ...
Had these tires on my 01 WRX for nearly 10 months and have done over 10,000km s. Only 280 tread wear but they are very grippy both on wet and dry and quiet. I m yet to find out how long they ll last. Don t be put off by the cheap price and where its made. I d recommend them to anyone.
Read more
Would buy this tyre again.
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
FreddyMelb 27 Jun 2016
BANG for your buck high performance tyre!
Got those tyres 5 month ago, put down 4000 km s so far. First saw them online, for rather cheap (they ARE Chinese made), so that had put me off a bit, but then again MOMO is a strong brand so I figured since Michelin/ Goodyear and all make tyres i ...
Got those tyres 5 month ago, put down 4000 km s so far. First saw them online, for rather cheap (they ARE Chinese made), so that had put me off a bit, but then again MOMO is a strong brand so I figured since Michelin/ Goodyear and all make tyres in China so i took the gamble. Boy, wasn t i surprised at how good they are! It is definitely a high performance tyre, they are so grippy and quiet, had ContiSportContact 3 and Kumho Ku31 before, I d rate this tire to be equals to the ContiSportContact 3 and better than the Kumho KU31, and it cost 1/2 as much as the Continental. Good in both wet and dry. Definitely a bang for your buck high performance tyre,
Read more
Would buy this tyre again.
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
Henrique Casula 22 Mar 2012
(Ford FOCUS 1.6 SIGMA GLX)
Very hard Tire, with average performance, and very noisy
Hello Guys, I am from Brasil, and I have been using Momoå«s tires 94w 205/55/16 for the last 10k km. The tires are really hard, and lot of vibration go to suspension, consequently reducing the suspension (springs, shock absorbers, jambs) useful life. ...
Hello Guys, I am from Brasil, and I have been using Momoå«s tires 94w 205/55/16 for the last 10k km. The tires are really hard, and lot of vibration go to suspension, consequently reducing the suspension (springs, shock absorbers, jambs) useful life. For me, different of some internet reviews, that tires are noisy too, especially on roads with bad pavement or parallele piped. Fortunately I donå«t test the tires in extremely situations, than I have no comment about the tireå«s grip; I am comparing Momo Tires, with the last two sets of tires I had before it. Before Momo tires, I had used Michelin Primacy 3 (91V), and Bridgestone ER30(91V) in my Ford Focus. I had used Michelin and Bridgestone many times in extremely situations, like dangerous road curve, water in the road, sudden changes in direction in height velocity... And, no complain about that tires. Both lasted more than 50k km, both are noiseless, and both had good grip. >>>> To be fair I am writing my perception about the tires after 60,000km of use. It s still noisy and hard, but I ve never had a tire so durable. There is still 2mm left to reach the TWI, I am changing this tired with 70,000km. My last 2 sets of tires (Michelin Primacy 3 and Bridgestone E30) lasted 50,000km, this makes this tire have a 40% greater durability. About the grip I have had no complain so far.
Read more
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
Cody 22 Sep 2011
(2008 Ford Fiesta XR4)
Great value, but performance really drops off after about 10k
Considering thier low price the tires perform really well. I was happy with the dry grip for the first 10k kms, the wet grip has always been a bit iffy. The last 10k kms have been underwhelming and are the primary reason I wouldn t buy these tyres ag ...
Considering thier low price the tires perform really well. I was happy with the dry grip for the first 10k kms, the wet grip has always been a bit iffy. The last 10k kms have been underwhelming and are the primary reason I wouldn t buy these tyres again. While it can be exciting, loss of traction with these tyres can happen unexpectedly, which leads me to the conclusion that they would be pretty ordinary in an emergency situation.
Read more
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
Jeremy 22 Sep 2010
(2011 Mercedes-Benz MB W204 C250 with amg pack)
Low noise, High Grip, Long Life
Use on 2011 MB W204 C250. Before I bought this, it was rather difficult to find a reveiw. But at $150, it is much better that the next best Kumho. The original Conti was VERY VERY noisy, very little grip for its price and worse it only lasted 13000+ ...
Use on 2011 MB W204 C250. Before I bought this, it was rather difficult to find a reveiw. But at $150, it is much better that the next best Kumho. The original Conti was VERY VERY noisy, very little grip for its price and worse it only lasted 13000+ km. Rear wear was worse than front and will definitely not pass inspection. I had Kumho Ecsta on previous c180 w203 coupe after Pirelli PZero and its was 120% better than the PZero s. But as usual when a trye is good and becomes popular, the Australian resellers increase the profit margin exponentially. Found Momo on ebay and for 2 months, I searched for a review on them. I only found 1 customer review. Since it was cheaper than Kumho, I enquired about it and the seller said that if it did not performed as they said it would, they would gladly pro-rata for another make. Most I d loose is $100 for 4. Due to car s staggered sizes. I have changed so many tyres for the 35 years of driving. From what I can tell, from me waiting for the tyres to be balanced and put on, this Momo s were, for them, the easiest to balanced. I could watch them, and it took only 5 goes on the balance machine. The kumho s too more than 7 before it balanced properly and then it would loose its balance as it wears. I ve had the Momo s from about 13000 something to now, about 72000+ km. The rears are worn now, maybe another 3000 km and need to change. The fronts still have about 20%. That ll last me another 10000 km. Noise - on the original Conti s that come with the car, Contact 5 I think, noise was unbearable as it wears. The noise overpowers the engine noise. It gets louder and louder as it wears. The grip also reduces exponentially as it wears. At about 40% thread it starts to aquaplane on small pools, NSW Sydney roads. This Momo s have been consistant throughout its life. Tyre road noise is still low. I can hear the engine and transmission whine more than I can hear the tyre road noise. Of course, on Sydney roads, when the road is coarser that normal then I can hear the roar but not as much as the Contis. Even at 10% thread, it will aquaplane slightly but when car nanny takes over, it stops aquaplanning immediately. Whereas with the Contis, it does not matter what the car nanny does, it just aquaplanes until you almost have to stop. Grip - What can I say, again the Momo s are consistant. The Conti s looses it grip as it wears. Car nanny comes on more often with the Contis than the Momos. In fact even at 10% rear thread, nanny does not come on until I push it to extreme. Life - Contis lasted only 13000+ from new. Momo s I ve had them on, now reading 72000+ km. I am definitely going back to Momos.
Read more
Would buy this tyre again.
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
Dean 2086 28 Aug 2009
(Ford Falcon ute bf)
Good at first now not so sure
Have done about 15000 Kay s on mine and the fronts are starting to de laminate on some edges. Driven sensibly by mature driver. On my BF ford ute, xl poverty pack Wouldn t go there again Not sure what I will try next time , these were a diss ...
Have done about 15000 Kay s on mine and the fronts are starting to de laminate on some edges. Driven sensibly by mature driver. On my BF ford ute, xl poverty pack Wouldn t go there again Not sure what I will try next time , these were a dissapointing purchase Think I will take to a dealer to discuss
Read more
Similar opinion? Write a review!
Noise
Wet Braking
Dry Braking
Cornering
Wear
QUOTE REQUEST
Submitting ...
Submitting ...
4th Tyre Free!
